Re: Word to PDF vs. Frame to PDF

Subject: Re: Word to PDF vs. Frame to PDF
From: Jean Hollis Weber <jean -at- wrevenge -dot- com -dot- au>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 16:07:35 +1000

Karen,
I think some of the answer will depend on whether you've upgraded to Acrobat 4.

My experience is very limited, but I found that converting a moderately
complex Word file using Acrobat 3 was painful and gave poor results (lack
of graphics and/or text quality) unless I did a lot of tweaking of
settings. Then I got Acrobat 4; converting the same Word file was easy,
hassle-free, and gave excellent results.

I haven't tried converting a FrameMaker file.

Regards, Jean
Jean Hollis Weber
The Technical Editors' Eyrie http://www.wrevenge.com.au/
Avalook at Australia: Travel site http://www.avalook.com.au/
mailto:jean -at- wrevenge -dot- com -dot- au


At 02:58 9/21/99 -0700, Karen Field wrote:
>What can you tell me about converting Word 97 docs to PDF vs. Frame docs to
>PDF? What I'm looking for here is confirmation that the Frame conversion is
>easier and simpler (this is one of my campaign points for getting Frame
>here).
>
>Any feedback--including the advantages of Word over Frame for this (if
>any)--are greatly appreciated.
>
>TIA,
>
>Karen Field
>kfield -at- stellcom -dot- com




Previous by Author: Can't find some markup tools in Acrobat 4
Next by Author: Re: Independent Editors - What do they do?
Previous by Thread: Word to PDF vs. Frame to PDF
Next by Thread: Re: Word to PDF vs. Frame to PDF


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads