reviewer's guides - clarification

Subject: reviewer's guides - clarification
From: Jennifer Collins <jcollins -at- RIVERBEDTECH -dot- com>
To: "'techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com'" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 09:58:06 -0400

> Guess I didn't do too well in the technical communication department
> yesterday!
>
> To clarify: as I understand it, a "reviewer's guide" is (to rip off Tom
> Storer's definition) a guide to be sent along with the product to
> journalists and outside analysts so they can judge our software.
>
> Do you agree with this definition? And if so, what can you tell me about
> this audience? what do they expect to find in such a guide? (besides
> clearer writing than I've produced so far (grin))
>
> thanks!!




Previous by Author: reviewer's guides
Next by Author: summary: reviewers' guides (long)
Previous by Thread: OT: What's This help with Visual C++
Next by Thread: Reviewer guide?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads