TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Are these words being used? From:"George F. Hayhoe" <george -at- ghayhoe -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>, <JULIA -at- juliasugarbaker -dot- com> Date:Mon, 8 Nov 1999 09:59:19 -0500
Julia Countryman said, with regard to "orderability" and
<<. . . what we're talking about here is not a technical
term, which has much more leeway as far as its usage, but a
word form that doesn't exist (at least not in the Oxford
Dictionary), so in this case, my reply would be "I ain't
gonna use it.">>
With respect, Julia, if a word is used, it exists, whether
it appears in the Oxford Dictionary or any other dictionary.
Speakers of English and all other languages are remarkably
innovative and coin new words every day to meet their needs.
If you've got a dictionary that's more than a dozen years
old, try looking up "e-mail," "online," and "Internet." Does
the fact that these words don't appear in that dictionary
mean that they "don't exist" and therefore shouldn't be
That's why dictionary makers are constantly at work on new
editions. Otherwise, we speakers of English would still be
using Johnson's Dictionary and we wouldn't have needed that
new-fangled Oxford upstart a hundred years ago--or its
We're technical communicators, not gatekeepers for the
English language. Our documents should use the terms that