TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Unprofessional possessive From:"Halter, Meg" <HalterMC -at- navair -dot- navy -dot- mil> To:"'Dick Margulis'" <margulis -at- mail -dot- fiam -dot- net>, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com Date:Mon, 29 Nov 1999 13:12:18 -0800
I think you hit on exactly what the author was thinking. This approach
should work in convincing him. Thanks.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dick Margulis [SMTP:margulis -at- mail -dot- fiam -dot- net]
> The possessive case is acceptable in even the most formal diction. There
> are situations, however, where it is best avoided.
> For example, there has been a trend in medicine (and similar trends in
> some specific scientific fields) to remove the possessive from specific
> eponyms: doctors write about Down syndrome, not Down's syndrome, etc.
> In addition, and more broadly, many careful writers avoid applying the
> possessive case to inanimate objects, although in the more informal tone
> adopted in much technical writing, this does not generally apply. So,
> formally, "the front panel of the printer"; informally, "the printer's
> front panel"; somewhere in between, "the printer front panel".
> But the pilot is animate and capable of possessing a head, a helmet, even
> a thought. So the possessive is standard usage in that instance.