Re: Decomposing?

Subject: Re: Decomposing?
From: "Robyn Hume" <rhume -at- sunshine -dot- net>
To: "Nancy this-address-is-valid McGough" <nm -at- NoAdsPlease -dot- ii -dot- com>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 22:13:06 -0800

>Right now the section title is "Decomposing a Recipe" and it
>follows a section called "Anatomy of a Recipe." Probably "disect"
>fits better with "anatomy"

so, i would be making, oh i don't know... half rotted caribou for 50 say and
first i would have to figure out the anatomy of the beast before i skinned
and sliced it..i mean disected it..so i know where the liver and kidneys
are... then i leave it out in the sun for a few weeks to decompose...

there have to be better words....;-) maybe not as literal true, but more
palatable......





Previous by Author: RE: Improving colleagues' writing skills
Next by Author: Re: Important vs. Importantly: Which is correct?
Previous by Thread: Re: Decomposing?
Next by Thread: RE: Font Weirdness--Word 97 on Win 95; CORRECTION!!!


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads