RE: techwr-l digest: December 09, 1999

Subject: RE: techwr-l digest: December 09, 1999
From: Bill Burns <BillDB -at- intl -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 09:53:26 -0700

> If that's a stab at "that which is not MS-Word", I'd
> say wait another year or two and as Linux makes more
> and more of an impression on the business desktop,
> Word will lose market share.
>
> I hope Adobe has the brains to come out with a worthy
> successor to Frame, that works on Linux... :-)
>
I'm not worried about Linux becoming a major player in the standard desktop
environment anytime soon. I'm as intrgued by it as a lot of people are, but
setting it up is not yet quite as convenient as it needs to be for the
average user. Ever have to set up XFree86 for an unsupported video card?
Sure, it CAN be done, but how many home users are that wild about hand
editing files to do it?

Like I said, it's not that I don't want to use Linux; it's just not ready to
take on the home desktop market yet--much less the business market. When it
is, I'll be happy to say goodbye to Windows.

Bill Burns - Eccentric Technology Consultant
INT'L.com Design & Development
billdb -at- intl -dot- com
Y2K Complacent




Previous by Author: RE: Conversion of html to pdf
Next by Author: RE: "Two-track" documentation
Previous by Thread: RE: techwr-l digest: December 09, 1999
Next by Thread: Documenting enabled/disabled items


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads