RE: Documenting enabled/disabled items

Subject: RE: Documenting enabled/disabled items
From: "Brady, Joy" <JBrady -at- alldata -dot- net>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>, "'Christina Tolliver'" <christina_tolliver -at- hotmail -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 16:31:30 -0500

Christina,

I can tell you from personal experience that this sort of information is
critical, especially where the software does not present a consistent
interface. You'll be doing a service to your users, who will appreciate the
verification. Also, you've identified and recorded for your developers
something they can improve in the software's next release.

Also, if I were using your procedures, I would much prefer your second
sample, where you name the specific fields. The first verges on being
redundant (it seems to me that "enabled" *almost* equals "editable") It's
almost a circular definition.






Previous by Author: RE: Motivation
Next by Author: RE: Do you just bite your tongue?
Previous by Thread: Re: Documenting enabled/disabled items
Next by Thread: RE: Documenting enabled/disabled items


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads