RE: "Two-tracked documentation"

Subject: RE: "Two-tracked documentation"
From: Brian Clements <bclements -at- fpix -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 14:02:01 -0600

Does anyone know of a good Microsoft Outlook reference book that contains
extensive info on Outlook forms? Most of the books we've found tend to say
"Forms are outside the scope of this book" and contain little or nothing on
the subject. All suggestions are appreciated.

Brian Clements
fpix, inc.
bclements -at- fpix -dot- com

-----Original Message-----
From: John Locke [mailto:john -at- freelock -dot- com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 1:37 PM
Subject: RE: "Two-tracked documentation"

Tom Murrell writes:
. I don't think Technical Writing can be reduced to a Prime
Directive. Information is not more important than Audience, nor is Audience
more important than Information.

I agree with this, that technical writing can't be reduced to a prime
However, a single document can-and should. We should be able to identify the
"prime directive" of any single document. If we can't, if the document
serves too many masters, it loses its relevance.

Our job is to plan and write documents. If you have two different purposes
to address, sometimes you can address both, at the expense of being perfect
for neither-but the more divergent the purposes are, the more you should
consider writing two different documents.

That said, the current discussions of single-sourcing documents become
totally relevant-is it possible to reuse appropriate paragraphs/sections
between two different documents with different purposes?

--John Locke

Sponsored by Weisner Associates Inc., Online Information Services
Training & consulting for RoboHELP, Dreamweaver, HTML, and HTML-Based Help.
More info at or mailto:training -at- weisner -dot- com -dot-

Sponsored by ForeignExchange (
Rely on ForeignExchange for responsive and professional
software localization and technical translation services.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: bclements -at- FPIX -dot- COM
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-9753F -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Rational SoDA
Next by Author: Re: Is there an "official" term for this process?
Previous by Thread: RE: "Two-tracked documentation"
Next by Thread: Re: "Two-tracked documentation"

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads