Re: Greetings and Salutations

Subject: Re: Greetings and Salutations
From: "Dick Margulis" <margulis -at- mail -dot- fiam -dot- net>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 99 12:19:00 -0500

The earlier post (deleted, I don't recall who sent it) that suggested Dear Susan Smith gets my vote. It has ample traditional precedent among groups that eschew titles on principle, and it avoids the awkwardness that arises when we do not know the sex of the recipient (or, often, which is the surname and which the given name). This arises more and more frequently as our contacts become global and as we encounter a larger number of foreign-born individuals in this country (some of whom retain their birth names in the original order and some of whom Americanize their names by reversing the order).

My $.02


---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Cheryl Magadieu <cherylm -at- atg -dot- com>
Reply-To: Cheryl Magadieu <cherylm -at- atg -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 11:07:21 -0500

I always use courtesy titles and last names when writing formal letters.
When in doubt, it's always best to be too courteous. As others have
mentioned, Ms. is the acceptable form when addressing women.

Previous by Author: RE: Baseline Skillset for Technical Writers?
Next by Author: Re: word
Previous by Thread: Re: Greetings and Salutations
Next by Thread: Re: greetings and salutations

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads