Re: Warnings and liability (was: Plagiarism vs Fixed Botches)

Subject: Re: Warnings and liability (was: Plagiarism vs Fixed Botches)
From: Jo Francis Byrd <jbyrd -at- byrdwrites -dot- com>
To: Kat Nagel <katnagel -at- eznet -dot- net>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 17:20:36 -0600

I imagine you and the rest who protested the idiot's demands thoroughly enjoyed
that, too! I certainly would have!!

Jo Byrd

Kat Nagel wrote:

> At 08:34 AM 03/20/2000 -0600, Tracy wrote:
> >Kat Nagel wrote:
> >
> Oh, and he wanted to remove all the cautions and warnings because they "looked
> tacky".
>
> Just out of curiosity, would this raise any liability issues? I realize your
> defense would be that you were following instructions, but would that stand up in
> court?
>
>
> Liability issues? Oh my, yes!
>
> I forwarded a request to their Regulatory Affairs office and let THEM slap him
> down. You could hear the smack echoing through the halls for weeks afterward.





Previous by Author: Re: Time Standards on Contractors
Next by Author: Re: >;-> Re: F1 for help
Previous by Thread: Warnings and liability (was: Plagiarism vs Fixed Botches)
Next by Thread: Re: Warnings and liability (was: Plagiarism vs Fixed Botches)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads