RE: Framemaker vs. Pagemaker

Subject: RE: Framemaker vs. Pagemaker
From: Suzette Seveny <sseveny -at- petvalu -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 17:12:30 -0500

dbdoucette -at- bandl -dot- com wrote:
> "Giordano, Connie" wrote:
>
> > Is Framemaker really that commonly used? Perhaps in well-established
> > companies with larger than lone tech writer departments. >snip<
>
> We used FrameMaker when I was a lone writer. We use FM now that our tech
> writer
> "department" numbers 2. Is this common? I don't know. But it belies your
> assumption that F< is limited to companies with large tech writer
departments.

I'll second that. I am a lone techwriter (never have worked in a techwriter
department). We use framemaker for the stability, cross-reference, pdf, and
all that other good stuff. We reuse chapters, and the book feature is just
great for us.

Suzette Seveny
Markham, Ontario, Canada
sseveny -at- petvalu -dot- com or suzette -at- yesic -dot- com
------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER:
Any opinions expressed are MY opinions.
Feel free to have your own.
Let's agree to disagree
But Please - Don't Flame Me.

The optimist says the glass is half full. The pessimist says the
glass is half empty. The engineer says the glass is twice as big
as it needs to be.






Previous by Author: What do I call this?
Next by Author: RE: Newsletter Help & Idea Request
Previous by Thread: RE: Framemaker vs. Pagemaker
Next by Thread: Re: Framemaker vs. Pagemaker


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads