RE: Telcordia vs Bellcore

Subject: RE: Telcordia vs Bellcore
From: "Harry Bacheler" <hbacheler -at- geo -dot- census -dot- gov>
To: "Rahel Bailie" <r_bailie -at- trillium -dot- com>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:15:13 -0500

Rahel

My take is to use their own format (Telcordia (formerly Bellcore)), even if
it may be awkward. I was just at their website

Harry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bounce-techwr-l-20951 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
> [mailto:bounce-techwr-l-20951 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com]On Behalf Of Rahel
> Bailie
> Sent: Tuesday, 28 March, 2000 02:08 PM
> To: TECHWR-L
> Subject: Telcordia vs Bellcore
>
> Fellow Techwhirlers,
>
> When referring to a standard that has been a Bellcore standard,
> how have you
> been referring to it since Bellcore became Telcordia: Bellcore, Bellcore
> (now Telcordia), Telcordia, Telcordia (formerly Bellcore), or other? No
> matter how I write it, the phrasing seems awkward.
>
> Any succinct opinions are appreciated.
> __________________________________________________________
> Rahel Bailie, Technical Communicator, Trillium Digital Systems,
> Canada Ltd.
> www.trillium.com Tel +1-604-320-7338, ext. 5003
> The World's Source for Communications SoftwareTM
>





Previous by Author: RE: HELP! (Word/Visio File Size) SUMMARY AND THANKS
Next by Author: RE: Placement of tables/figures
Previous by Thread: Re: Telcordia vs Bellcore
Next by Thread: Re: FW: Telcordia vs Bellcore


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads