Re: Documentation Coding

Subject: Re: Documentation Coding
From: "Stuart Conner" <sconner -at- ndsuk -dot- com>
To: techwr-l
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 11:16:29 +0100

We use:

<originating group code>.<document type code>.<optional field>.<sequential
number>.<issue>

This coding system gives some 'meaning' to the document code, which I
personally think is a good thing (you can tell what type of document it is,
for example). Some others in the company feel that the document code should
just be a plain, unique number with no implied meaning. Anyone have any
strong feelings on which system might be better?

Stuart.


Emily Clark wrote in message <54410 -at- techwr-l>...
>
>Hi!
>
>I am reorganizing the documentation coding system in my company. We are
>toying with many ideas and would welcome any suggestions for this. How are
>documents coded in other companies?
>
>
>--
>Emily Clark
>Documentation Researcher
>Texar.com
>
>
>






Previous by Author: RE: Structure vs. Substance?
Next by Author: RE: Word to .PDF files
Previous by Thread: Documentation Coding
Next by Thread: Re: Documentation Coding


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads