Re: Documentation Coding

Subject: Re: Documentation Coding
From: "Kat Nagel" <kat_nagel -at- rte -dot- com>
To: "Stuart Conner" <sconner -at- ndsuk -dot- com>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 08:32:22 -0400

We (the Office of Quality) have just proposed a document numbering
system, and the response so far has been less than enthusiastic. It
seems like overkill to most of the developers and project managers.
"Call it whatever you like, and let VSS take care of the version


----- Original Message -----
From: Stuart Conner <sconner -at- ndsuk -dot- com>
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: Documentation Coding

> We use:
> <originating group code>.<document type code>.<optional
> number>.<issue>
> This coding system gives some 'meaning' to the document code,
which I
> personally think is a good thing (you can tell what type of
document it is,
> for example). Some others in the company feel that the document
code should
> just be a plain, unique number with no implied meaning. Anyone
have any
> strong feelings on which system might be better?
> Stuart.
> Emily Clark wrote in message <54410 -at- techwr-l>...
> >
> >Hi!
> >
> >I am reorganizing the documentation coding system in my company.
We are
> >toying with many ideas and would welcome any suggestions for
this. How are
> >documents coded in other companies?
> >
> >
> >--
> >Emily Clark
> >Documentation Researcher
> >
> >
> >
> >

Previous by Author: Re: Other Clients from Hell
Next by Author: Re: working with other writers
Previous by Thread: Re: Documentation Coding
Next by Thread: Re: Documentation Coding

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads