TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Are Zip drives obsolete? From:Richard Smith <rsmith -at- rapidlogic -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 13 Nov 2000 10:33:16 -0800
CDRWs work fine. I use them regularly. Speed depends on the amount of data
to backup and the speed of the drive you purchase. I've never used a Zip, so
I have no basis of comparison.
When I backup, I use the Joliet FS type, I don't use the UDF file system.
UDF is the write 1 file at a time, like it is a floppy disk type of burning.
I have personally found the UDF writing utilities (DirectCD, InCD) to be a
bit flaky, and unreadable on many systems without the right software.
But stick with basic ISO-9660 file system (or Joliet-what most CD's are) and
it works great. As far as time to burn, I have an older two speed and it
takes about 35min. to burn a whole 650MB disk.
Not that anybody asked, but hard drives are very cheap these days. Adding a
second hard drive is a very easy way to provide redundancy, albeit without
the portability of a CD.
> From: BethK [mailto:kanerb -at- concentric -dot- net]
> Subject: RE: Are Zip drives obsolete?
> I was wondering if Zip is becoming obsolete, too. I do my
> personal backups
> on Zip disks, and I'm disappointed; I think it takes too
> long, and the disks
> don't hold enough info. My backup -- files only, no apps --
> requires 12
> 100MB Zip disks right now. That's too much disk shuffling. I
> use the Iomega
> 1-Step Backup, and it's fine for incremental backups (adding
> changed & new
> files to an existing full backup), but sometimes it fails and
> forces me to
> redo the whole backup. Then, since I don't have 24 disks, I
> have to erase
> the old disks as I go, which temporarily leaves me with NO backup. I
> hesitate to buy more (expensive) disks because I'm not sure I
> want to stick
> with this b/u method.
> I have not tried a CDRW; seems like it ought to be much
> faster, yet some of
> you are saying it's slow, too.
> What about tape backup drives -- are they obsolete? Too slow?
> Beth Kane
Sponsored by SOLUTIONS, Conferences and Seminars for Communicators
Publications Management Clinic, TECH*COMM 2001 Conference, and more http://www.SolutionsEvents.com or 800-448-4230
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.