RE: Significant digits

Subject: RE: Significant digits
From: Richard Smith <rsmith -at- rapidlogic -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 12:08:55 -0800

Hi John,
I think he is, because (ahem, if i really remember college that well)
0.00123456 could be represented as 1.23456 x(10 to the -3rd power) retaining
six significant digits.

Also consider the number 2.5 x(10 to the -64th power) still has only two
signifacant digits, but 63 zeros to the right of the decimal.

Richard Smith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Posada [mailto:jposada01 -at- yahoo -dot- com]
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 11:51 AM
> Subject: Significant digits
> Hi, guys...I've go a developer that is insisting that the following
> statement is accurate:
> "All conversion rates are processed and displayed to six significant
> digits. E.g. 12.3456 or 123.456 or 0.00123456."
> My contention is that the last number is displayed to eight
> significant digits and that six digits would be 0.001234.
> Who is right?

Develop HTML-based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver! (STC Discount.)
**NEW DATE/LOCATION!** January 16-17, 2001, New York, NY. or 800-646-9989.

Sponsored by SOLUTIONS, Conferences and Seminars for Communicators
Publications Management Clinic, TECH*COMM 2001 Conference, and more or 800-448-4230

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Are Zip drives obsolete?
Next by Author: RE: beyond RoboHELP
Previous by Thread: RE: Significant digits
Next by Thread: Re: Significant digits

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads