RE: Agency warning signs

Subject: RE: Agency warning signs
From: Marguerite Krupp <mkrupp -at- cisco -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 08:56:53 -0500

Bravo, Andrew and John!

Having been both a contractor and a doc manager (among other things), I
agree wholeheartedly.

The agency and the contractor both have a vested interest in each other's
success. The cut the agency takes varies, and so do the services. This is
one place where networking and professional societies CAN help you find a
good fit, but I agree that IME the NWU has a unionist focus (and generally a
bent toward "creative" writers, rather than "technical" writers). [That's a
different argument. I won't go there.]

So the word for contractors is "shop around and trust your gut!"


Develop HTML-Based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver 4 ($100 STC Discount)
**WEST COAST LOCATIONS** San Jose (Mar 1-2), San Francisco (Apr 16-17) or 800-646-9989.

Sponsored by DigiPub Solutions Corp, producers of PDF 2001
Conference East, June 4-5, Baltimore/Washington D.C. area. or toll-free 877/278-2131.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Requirements
Next by Author: RE: Textbook writing
Previous by Thread: RE: Agency warning signs
Next by Thread: Re: Agency warning signs

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads