RE: I just got one of those resumes

Subject: RE: I just got one of those resumes
From: "Jane Carnall" <jane -dot- carnall -at- digitalbridges -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:45:30 -0000

Paul Strasser wrote:
>>The reasons I gave in my previous post for using templates was based on
assumption that it was a no-lose situation. It can't hurt, at worst is a
neutral - and at best a positive. I'd be happy to reconsider my assumptions
if we can think of reasons why they'd be a negative.<<

I agree with you. It's like wearing a suit to an interview is for a man. If
I haven't said so already, I *am* going to go back to my CV and edit it
again in the light of some of these comments, to see if (without removing
the valuable quality of portable readability) I can add in some
ginger-peachy-keen techniques.

But I do find it odd that so many people say they would make so many
negative assumptions about the creator of a CV based on that single
document. It's like interviewers who claim that they can tell everything
they need to know about a candidate from the first two minutes of the
interview: they may well have made up their minds by that time, but they
certainly don't do it on the basis of *knowledge*.

Using what the CVs look like as a means of getting the numbers down to a
reasonable level is fair enough, even if it means some potentially good
employees are unfairly discarded: but it works as a mass-weeding tool, not
as a method for making Holmesian deductions about the CV's creator. Of
course, Holmes was (almost) always right: but that's because he was
fictional. I think most people on this list probably don't have that

"You have been in Afghanistan, I perceive."

Jane Carnall
Technical Writer, Digital Bridges, Scotland
Unless stated otherwise, these opinions are mine, and mine alone. Apologies
for the long additional sig: it is added automatically and outwith my


E-mail is an informal method of communication and may be subject to data corruption, interception and unauthorised amendment for which Digital Bridges Ltd will accept no liability. Therefore, it will normally be inappropriate to rely on information contained on e-mail without obtaining written confirmation.

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.


Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for?

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See and check it out.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Re: I just got one of those resumes: From: Paul Strasser

Previous by Author: RE: what is process
Next by Author: RE: job interview with tests
Previous by Thread: Re: I just got one of those resumes
Next by Thread: Re: I just got one of those resumes

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads