Re: Benefits of FrameMaker

Subject: Re: Benefits of FrameMaker
From: Chris Morrow <cmorrow -at- tripos -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:25:09 -0600

Hi Tom & all,

Thanks for those who have provided feedback so far. I will use it.

> Are you using Frame there now? If so, you won't have to convert any
> documents to Word.

Yes. We use Frame right now.

> Why does QA think Word is any better? What benefit do they say that Word
> would provide?

I don't know. It is a little bizarre to me that QA is telling documentation what to use to develop the docs. I (sorta) understand their need to be involved with our template decisions (i.e. final look of the document). But when they provide us a Word document that doesn't even use any type of Style tag, their font is Arial Narrow (10pt), and their margins are all messed baffles my mind...

Serenity now!

> I can think of one why they might want you to go to Word.
> Easier to collaborate with non-TW's

Yes. This is one reason that I agree with.


Now's a great time to buy RoboHelp! You'll get SnagIt screen capture
software and a $200 onsite training voucher FREE when you buy RoboHelp
Office or RoboHelp Enterprise. Hurry, this offer expires February 28, 2002.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Benefits of FrameMaker
Next by Author: RoboHelp Training Web Sites?
Previous by Thread: RE: Benefits of FrameMaker (additional benefits / ROI report)
Next by Thread: Re: Benefits of FrameMaker

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads