Re: Redundancy - Necessary?

Subject: Re: Redundancy - Necessary?
From: "Bonnie Granat" <bgranat -at- editors-writers -dot- info>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:10:29 -0500

----- Original Message -----
From: <CarolAnne -dot- Wall -at- minnesotamutual -dot- com>

> If I wrote the following description:
> Woobbly Factor Widgets only. Displays the percentage of woobblies.
> would adding the following be redundant?
> Otherwise, this field and label do not display.

If the description is saying that the Woobbly Factor is only going to appear
for widgets, and that it appears in percentage form, then I'd put "Widgets
only" in very noticable boldface and I would not use an additional
explanation. "Widgets only" should convey the meaning on its own if the
concept of "<something> only" in the context of this description is
understood by the user.

Bonnie Granat
bgranat -at- editors-writers -dot- info

Now's a great time to buy RoboHelp! You'll get SnagIt screen capture
software and a $200 onsite training voucher FREE when you buy RoboHelp
Office or RoboHelp Enterprise. Hurry, this offer expires February 28, 2002.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Redundancy - Necessary?: From: CarolAnne . Wall

Previous by Author: Re: what to call it
Next by Author: Re: HOW TOs?
Previous by Thread: Re: Redundancy - Necessary?
Next by Thread: Re: Redundancy - Necessary?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads