Redundancy - Necessary?

Subject: Redundancy - Necessary?
From: CarolAnne -dot- Wall -at- minnesotamutual -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 07:49:44 -0600

If I wrote the following description:
Woobbly Factor Widgets only. Displays the percentage of woobblies.

would adding the following be redundant?
Otherwise, this field and label do not display.

I think I am being redundant. But I can just hear the testers (the primary
audience for the document) saying, "Why isn't the Woobbly Factor field
displaying for Doodads?" That's why I think I should leave it in. But,
alas, I am torn. I would appreciate input.

By the way, omitting the potential redundancy would not harm fowl nor
beast. I just work for an insurance company.

Carol Anne, writer and now editor of this piece of documentation.

Carol Anne T. Wall, FLMI
Technical Writer - Individual Business Technology, Minnesota Life Insurance
carolanne -dot- wall -at- minnesotamutual -dot- com

Now's a great time to buy RoboHelp! You'll get SnagIt screen capture
software and a $200 onsite training voucher FREE when you buy RoboHelp
Office or RoboHelp Enterprise. Hurry, this offer expires February 28, 2002.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: deer in the headlights (corporate anorexia)
Next by Author: Thanks, Thanks (was: Redundancy - Necessary?)
Previous by Thread: RE: HOW TOs?
Next by Thread: Re: Redundancy - Necessary?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads