Re: Frame&SGML: looking for opinions of current users
Consider this a vast improvement over 6.0 and earlier.
Not for everyday use. Re-starting the same program and switching between two products have about an equal nuisance value.
> Also, since
much of the structure functionality is implemented via dlls (Win), clients (Unix), or plugins (Mac), the only way to load those things is at startup - so to load the capability into the product you need to restart.
Yes - I acknowledged that.However, there are ways around that: loading everything each time (and accepting a longer startup time) and giving an option of which interface to use during startup are the most obvious ones.
That said, I want to point out that the structure/SGML/XML capability is a strict superset of the unstructured product. What that means is, you have no *need* to switch to the unstructured mode - ever. If you want to edit an unstructured document, just edit an unstructured document. (Note that opening a structured doc in unstructured Maker will strip the structure data out of it on SAVE.)
That's exactly why you'd want to switch - to control the output. If you work for one company, that might not matter, but if you're a contractor, it can.
Since DocBook is probably the most thorough and most complete DTD in use, virtually nobody has an application that makes use of the entire DTD.
No, but I can dream, can't I?
> So it is with DocBook - a *complete*
implementation of DocBook for FrameMaker would be prohibitively expensive, and it would also be prohibitively cumbersome for the user - or so the theory goes.
You're right.But even a subset would be a welcome feature.
Also, I'm not sure of this, but DocBook may utilize some aspects of SGML that Maker can't support... But we're talking about pretty esoteric stuff here.
What did you have in mind? I'm not intimately familiar with DocBook, but I can't think of anything off-hand (which doesn't mean that it doesn't exist, of course).The problem with DocBook is more its size than anything else.
Anyway, Maker 7 ships with starter kits for DocBook - SGML and XML flavors. You can establish structure applications for them and make something reasonable happen. Check out the docs to see what is supported.
Unless I missed something, there's nothing that can't be pulled off the web.
And, yes, you can certainly set up FrameMaker 7.0 to work with DocBook, as I mentioned. But that's not the point. The point is that,in many ways, DocBook is to markup languages what .doc format is to standard word processing. You'd think that interface support for DocBook would be a basic feature of an ML GUI.
Bruce Byfield bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com 604.421.7177
"The world is crawling with the faithful,
Wide-eyed and gamblers to the core;
Johnny gets burned, he lights another candle -
We do not do that any more."
Check out the new release of RoboDemo, our easy-to-use tutorial software.
Plus, buy RoboHelp Office in August and save $100 with our mail-in rebate.
Get details and download free trial versions at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
Acrobat & FrameMaker Seminars: PDF Best Practices, FrameMaker-to-Acrobat
Advanced Techniques, FM Template Design, Single Sourcing with FrameMaker
in Brussels (Oct), and in Montreal & Dallas (Dec): http://www.microtype.com/1
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
Re: Frame&SGML: looking for opinions of current users: From: Chris
Previous by Author:
Re: Job hunting in Canada
Next by Author: Re: Job hunting in Canada
Previous by Thread: Re: Frame&SGML: looking for opinions of current users
Next by Thread: Re: Frame&SGML: looking for opinions of current users
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites