RE: Skills matrix

Subject: RE: Skills matrix
From: "Marguerite Krupp" <mkrupp -at- cisco -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 11:31:57 -0400

Dick wrote:
>I would not drill down to the tools level. If someone is
> identified as having production skills, presumably that token
> refers to production skills within your company's tools environment.

I would be careful there. It's another case of (all together now...) "IT

Here at Megacorp (and elsewhere I've worked), we have a "production team"
who are wizards at getting the stuff to the customers, but they perform a
*manufacturing* function. They know nothing about a writer's tools, nor
should they. So, you would have to determine whether in your company's tools
environment, they'd be interested in writing tools or manufacturing tools,
and where they consider tools skills with beasties like Documentum or
ClearCase (to name a couple of specialties) to fall.


Purchase RoboHelp X3 in April and receive a $100 mail-in
rebate, plus FREE RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order here:

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Re: Skills matrix: From: Dick Margulis

Previous by Author: RE: IE and spell check
Next by Author: RE: Skills matrix
Previous by Thread: Re: Skills matrix
Next by Thread: RE: Skills matrix

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads