RE: Skills matrix

Subject: RE: Skills matrix
From: "Marguerite Krupp" <mkrupp -at- cisco -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 13:38:50 -0400

Thanks for the clarification, Dick. My point was that in *some* of the
companies I've worked for, "production skills" translated to manufacturing
environments. So in putting together a matrix that HR types, among others,
would be consulting, I'd be very careful about using that specific term. In
those cases, "production"=lower, non-salaried wages.Perhaps I, too, was not
as clear as I could have been.


Purchase RoboHelp X3 in April and receive a $100 mail-in
rebate, plus FREE RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order here:

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: Skills matrix: From: Dick Margulis

Previous by Author: RE: Skills matrix
Next by Author: Re: Starting a home tech writing business in PA
Previous by Thread: RE: Skills matrix
Next by Thread: RE: Skills matrix

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads