Re: "found" TW humor (low)

Subject: Re: "found" TW humor (low)
From: "Bonnie Granat" <bgranat -at- editors-writers -dot- info>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:51:48 -0700 (PDT)

On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:27:29 -0700, "Elise" wrote:

> "Bonnie Granat" wrote.
> > 2. There is no premise whatsoever for her metaphor
> *except* the word
> "bang".
> > That's my entire point. Only an interpretation of
> word in that way
> allows
> > for the metaphor.
> Hi Bonnie & others,
> As I have not yet taken a look at the article, I'm
> sure about the
> entire context, however, just within this paragraph
> several premises for
> the metaphor:
> - conception
> - not static but expanding -
> - it was getting bigger all the time
> Sounds like a reference to pregnancy? (Just another
> thought.)

The reference to pregnancy would be fine. A reference
to new life using a slang term that conveys the very
lowest form of interaction between men and women is
inappropriate, in my opinion.


Purchase RoboHelp X3 in April and receive a $100 mail-in
rebate, plus FREE RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order here:

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: "found" TW humor (low)
Next by Author: RE: "found" TW humor (low)
Previous by Thread: RE: "found" TW humor (low)
Next by Thread: RE: "found" TW humor (low)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads