RE: When a "shim" is not a "shim"

Subject: RE: When a "shim" is not a "shim"
From: eric -dot- dunn -at- ca -dot- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 11:11:38 -0400

>>"Add-on" and "Extension", aside from a connotation that now
>>has an unfortunate air about it, due to the "Thingy" sub-thread
>>also suggest (like "plug-in") that you'd be getting extra

Hmm. Add-ons, extensions, and plug-ins for your "thingy"....

Ties in nicely with the post on the reader's responsibility for the connections
and twists in interpretation they make. Gordon can hardly be blamed or held
responsible for Kevin's subsequent interpretation of "thingy".


Eric L. Dunn

Purchase RoboHelp X3 in April and receive a $100 mail-in
rebate, plus FREE RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order here:

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: "found" TW humor (low)
Next by Author: RE: certification
Previous by Thread: RE: When a "shim" is not a "shim"
Next by Thread: RE: When a "shim" is not a "shim"

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads