But seriously, I don't think the STC could be depoliticized enough to gain the trust of the people who have been bashing it as irrelevant all these years. I would think that this would have to come from a new organization that forms organically from a nucleus of interested techwr-l members. Credibility would attach when respected organizations like IEEE, PMI, PDMA, and the PR org that was mentioned yesterday but whose name I forgot cooperated in the development of the credentialing criteria and process and eventually endorsed the resulting standard.Good point. Another reason why the STC wouldn't be suitable (aside from its inability to fight its way out of a paper bag with a roadmap, a compass and a knife) is that it's too diffuse a body. Developing criteria for certification or accreditation, then promoting the idea and making it accessible would require a very focused effort. An organization designed especially for these purposes would probably have greater chances of success.
Bruce Byfield bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com 604.421.7177
"I have never yet known a man admit that he was either rich or asleep: perhaps the poor and the wakeful man have some great moral advantage."
- Patrick O'Brian, "Master and Commander"
Purchase RoboHelp X3 in April and receive a $100 mail-in rebate, plus FREE RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module. Order here: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l/
Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/special/contests/
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
RE: certification: From: Dick Margulis
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites