RE: URGENT: Immediate ethical issue

Subject: RE: URGENT: Immediate ethical issue
From: Kim Roper <kim -dot- roper -at- pixelink -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 13:39:53 -0400

Stephen Gillespie wrote:

> Off the top of my head, I recall that fair use

... would require attribution, right? My first thought about how to handle
this was to add notes stating "missing attribution to xxx on page yy,
paragraph z."

Cheers ... Kim
kim.roper at
(Message brought to you by countless electrons that gave their lives in the
fight for freedom of information.)


Order RoboHelp X3 in May and receive a $100 mail-in rebate, PLUS
free RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.

Order RoboHelp today:

ATTENTION FrameMaker Users: Fill-out the following survey
to receive a chance to win a FREE RoboScreenCapture.

FM users only please:

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: House-husbands (was RE: Chatty vs. Bitchy)
Next by Author: RE: RE: How Many Trees? (WAS: URGENT: Immediate ethical issue)
Previous by Thread: Re: URGENT: Immediate ethical issue
Next by Thread: RE: URGENT: Immediate ethical issue

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads