RE: finally! a non-economics question!

Subject: RE: finally! a non-economics question!
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: 11 Mar 2004 18:38:28 GMT


Yes, it's "with." Although, personally, I don't
associate with access buttons, they're not very
stimulating company.

Gene Kim-Eng



------- Original Message -------
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:16:08 -0500 Wright, Lynne wrote:
Ok wordsmiths...

I'm editing a manual by a writer who keeps using "associate to"... i've seen
it so many times, I can't tell any more whether its acceptable usage not...
as in the following statement:

"Use this section to associate telephone lines to access buttons."

it always "associate... with"?


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP IS THE INDUSTRY STANDARD IN HELP AUTHORING
New RoboHelp X5 includes all new features such as,
content management, multi-author support, distributed
workforce support, XML and PDF support, and much more!

Purchase new Macromedia RoboHelp X5 by March 31st and receive a
$100 mail-in rebate. http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: RE: RE: RE: My New OpenOffice.org tcolumn
Next by Author: RE: Re: "DO NOT COOK"?
Previous by Thread: Re: finally! a non-economics question!
Next by Thread: Re: finally! a non-economics question!


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads