Re: File name conventions

Subject: Re: File name conventions
From: Bruce Byfield <bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 16:30:26 -0800

Quoting nancy -dot- morgan -at- kaz-group -dot- com:

> Does anyone have an opinion on whether or not to include the version
> number in the filename?

I think its usefulness depends on whether you are using any form of version control.

If you are, then, it's redundant, and makes extra work for no purpose.

If you're not, then it's a reasonable substitute - although a somewhat
labor-intensive one, as you mentioned.

Bruce Byfield

"No matter who you vote for, the government gets in."
- OysterBand



RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward in Help authoring technology, featuring all new Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! View an online demo:

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: ADMIN: New Poll Question
Next by Author: Re: System Administrators
Previous by Thread: File name conventions
Next by Thread: Re: File name conventions

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads