Re: Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Subject: Re: Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
From: Lou Quillio <public -at- quillio -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 12:18:57 -0400

Jonathan Gravois wrote:
> I am trying to determine some semblance
> of what is being asked for and how does one gain "experience" in this
> matter.

Start here:

It's not natively an IT consideration, but becomes one when you
consider that reporting isn't a manual practice any more.

Also, IT departments (in some cases) have gained a reputation for
going a bit over-board with SOX compliance, and maybe being less
cost-conscious than is ideal. I guess you'll have that when new
regulatory soup isn't yet fully digested.



Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today!

Doc-To-Help 2005 now has RoboHelp Converter and HTML Source: Author
content and configure Help in MS Word or any HTML editor. No
proprietary editor! *August release.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: From: Jonathan Gravois

Previous by Author: Re: Flow-charting question
Next by Author: Re: tool to check that html files are listed in a javascript ToC
Previous by Thread: Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Next by Thread: RE: Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads