Re: References (was: Why discuss certification?)

Subject: Re: References (was: Why discuss certification?)
From: John Posada <jposada01 -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 07:54:03 -0700 (PDT)


Hence, the requirement for:

- X years experience
- Continuing education

--- "W. Kelly Oja" <judbasiner -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:

>
> I am not sure if a rant with this line of thinking has been posted
> or not. But, getting certified in something doesn't mean a whole
> <heck> of a lot if the person is not well
versed/experienced/whatever.


John Posada
Senior Technical Writer

"What do we want? More than
anybody else has."
Steve Ballmer

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l


---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Re: References (was: Why discuss certification?): From: W. Kelly Oja

Previous by Author: Re: References (was: Why discuss certification?)
Next by Author: Is this some obscure but correct terminology?
Previous by Thread: Re: References (was: Why discuss certification?)
Next by Thread: how best to divide and conquer an activity


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads