Re: References (was: Why discuss certification?)

Subject: Re: References (was: Why discuss certification?)
From: John Posada <jposada01 -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 07:54:03 -0700 (PDT)

Hence, the requirement for:

- X years experience
- Continuing education

--- "W. Kelly Oja" <judbasiner -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:

> I am not sure if a rant with this line of thinking has been posted
> or not. But, getting certified in something doesn't mean a whole
> <heck> of a lot if the person is not well

John Posada
Senior Technical Writer

"What do we want? More than
anybody else has."
Steve Ballmer


Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Re: References (was: Why discuss certification?): From: W. Kelly Oja

Previous by Author: Re: References (was: Why discuss certification?)
Next by Author: Is this some obscure but correct terminology?
Previous by Thread: Re: References (was: Why discuss certification?)
Next by Thread: how best to divide and conquer an activity

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads