Re: Framemaker v. Word v. ?

Subject: Re: Framemaker v. Word v. ?
From: Lou Quillio <public -at- quillio -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 21:13:56 -0400

T.W. Smith wrote:
> Well, if you use FM, those who edit the document need FM.
> Roundtripping from FM to Word is painful; the two products work in two
> different ways for two different audiences.
> However, for 60-80 pages Word will more than do what you want.

Seconded. You'd be forcing Frame into this situation. There'd be
substantial and permanent costs, and no benefit that I can see.

Folks already invested in Frame have serious issues ahead, of the
"How do I get out?" variety. To *start* sourcing in Frame today is



Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today!

Doc-To-Help 2005 converts RoboHelp files with one click. Author with Word or any HTML editor. Visit our site to see a conversion demo movie and learn more.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Framemaker v. Word v. ?: From: Melissa Wang
Re: Framemaker v. Word v. ?: From: T.W. Smith

Previous by Author: Re: Exercise to get participants involved
Next by Author: User Manual question
Previous by Thread: Re: Framemaker v. Word v. ?
Next by Thread: Re: Framemaker v. Word v. ?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads