RE: Boring documentation?

Subject: RE: Boring documentation?
From: "Jim Shaeffer" <jims -at- spsi -dot- com>
To: "David Loveless" <daveloveless -at- gmail -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:48:42 -0500

Take a look at Mark Baker's discussion of mavens:

Jim Shaeffer

> -----Original Message-----
> On another note, if our manuals are not being used or are seen as a
> last resort, what is our value? I don't want to be option F when my
> annual review comes around.
> Dave
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!.

Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Visio 2003 print to PostScript problem
Next by Author: RE: The 6-million-dollar documentation mistake
Previous by Thread: Re: Boring documentation?
Next by Thread: Microsoft affiliate program?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads