Re: Search Engine Rankings

Subject: Re: Search Engine Rankings
From: Lou Quillio <public -at- quillio -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 20:19:20 -0400

Beth Agnew wrote:
> And because of the glut of keyword spammers, many search engines have
> now been adjusted to search the actual text of the page for the keywords
> as well. Therefore, your content must contain the keywords you expect
> search engines to find.

We can go further than that. By all knowledgeable reports, it's
been two years since major search engines have considered keyword
metadata at all.

They simply don't care what you wish to be known for, only what you
are known for.


WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!.

Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Search Engine Rankings: From: David Loveless
Re: Search Engine Rankings: From: Peter Lewicke
Re: Search Engine Rankings: From: al . geist
Re: Search Engine Rankings: From: Beth Agnew

Previous by Author: Re: Localization Question
Next by Author: Re: UNIX is UNIX...what is Linux?
Previous by Thread: Re: Search Engine Rankings
Next by Thread: Re: Search Engine Rankings

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads