RE: Geoff Lane's "arrogant PC bunch"

Subject: RE: Geoff Lane's "arrogant PC bunch"
From: "Dan Goldstein" <DGoldstein -at- riverainmedical -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:03:04 -0400

Perhaps everyone on both sides of this debate should briefly lay aside
their personal and political agendas, and instead focus on a basic rule
of tech writing: Know your audience. Figure out what offends them and
what doesn't, and forget about what the rest of us think.

This rule applies to a lot more important things than thumbs, dogs, and
ponies. It applies to the use of screen captures, tables of
abbreviations, white space, numbered lists, CHM file security... Ya
know, technical writing?

This has been *such* a wretched thread.

This message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing, copying, electronic storing or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us, by replying to the sender, and delete the original message immediately thereafter. Thank you.


Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output.

Now shipping: Help &amp; Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help &amp; Manual:

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: Geoff Lane's "arrogant PC bunch": From: Cardimon,Craig
RE: Geoff Lane's "arrogant PC bunch": From: Jonathan West

Previous by Author: RE: ADMIN: Pet Peeves
Next by Author: RE: Knowing what offends the audience (was Geoff Lane's "arrogant PCbunch"
Previous by Thread: RE: Geoff Lane's "arrogant PC bunch"
Next by Thread: Re: Geoff Lane's "arrogant PC bunch"

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads