Re: Anybody using Web 2.0 sites/services for doc projects?

Subject: Re: Anybody using Web 2.0 sites/services for doc projects?
From: "Mike Starr" <mikestarr-techwr-l -at- writestarr -dot- com>
To: "Chris Borokowski" <athloi -at- yahoo -dot- com>, "Rebecca Stevenson" <rjstevenson -at- sprynet -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 03:07:29 -0500

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/11/web_two_point_naught_answers/

--
Mike Starr WriteStarr Information Services
Technical Writer - Online Help Developer - Website developer
Graphic Designer - Desktop Publisher - MS Office Expert
Phone: (262) 694-1028 - Tollfree: (877) 892-1028 - Fax:(262) 697-6334
Email: mike -at- writestarr -dot- com - Web: http://www.writestarr.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Borokowski" <athloi -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "Rebecca Stevenson" <rjstevenson -at- sprynet -dot- com>;
<techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 8:35 AM
Subject: Re: Anybody using Web 2.0 sites/services for doc projects?

> Web 2.0 means two things: the stateful web and the
> interactive web. HTTP was originally a stateless
> protocol, meaning that each information exchange
> occurred without a persistent session. With the use of
> XML, Java and active server scripting (AJAX, etc) the
> web is now stateful, like a telnet session. Because
> this requires a newer-generation browser, server
> configuration and approach to programming web pages
> (not HTML but XHTML and JavaScript, generally) it is
> considered a new web paradigm.
>
> Naturally, this has consequences. A stateful web
> encourages more interaction between user and site, and
> that requires user-to-user interaction, something
> inherited from the success of IM and IRC, the sleeper
> killer apps of the internet age. This is the
> "interactive web" component of Web 2.0.
>
> Web 2.0 is hard to define because it is both
> technological and social (like the success of the
> telephone). It is a large leap in that it moves the
> web from HTML anyone can create to a salad of
> disunified technologies that require some programming
> background. It seems to me that the technological
> component is here to stay, and the interactive
> component has moved to the web and is unlikely to go
> away but also is not as important as many think it is.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

Now shipping: Help &amp; Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help &amp; Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.


References:
Re: Anybody using Web 2.0 sites/services for doc projects?: From: Chris Borokowski

Previous by Author: Re: "Appears" vs. "will appear"
Next by Author: Re: Word in 2010
Previous by Thread: Re: Anybody using Web 2.0 sites/services for doc projects?
Next by Thread: RE: Anybody using Web 2.0 sites/services for doc projects?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads