RE: Grammar Q

Subject: RE: Grammar Q
From: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>
To: "Fred Ridder" <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:47:27 -0500

On Behalf Of Fred Ridder just couldn't resist saying:
> One thing this whole discussion has overlooked is that both the
> second person and the future tense have a legitimate use when it is
> desirable to describe some alternative action and the (typically
> undesirable or unintended) result of that action. What I'm referring
> is a kind of informational admonition that doesn't need the additional
> emphasis of a "note" or "caution" markup. For example, in a procedure
> step, you may say something like:
> If you click Foo [instead of Bar], a kludge will occur.
> with the assumption that the reader is not trying to accomplish a
> If the result of the nonstandard action is atypical or undesirable, it
> doesn't work to recast the statement as:
> To perform a kludge, click Foo.
> because that's not what the reader needs or wants to do.
> It seems to me that in the hypothetical case of hypotheticals, the
> future tense is specifically appropriate because it *is* talking about
> the "nebulous future", namely an action or result that should not be
> made to occur when following the procedure.
I use similar constructions for exactly that sort of situation.
The references to the exceptional or non-standard or optional situations
then stand out nicely from the main instructional sequence which is all
written in the mode:

1. Do this. That happens.
2. When that happens, do this other thing. Such'n'such occurs.
3. At the such'n'such dialog, do...
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer without copying
or disclosing it.


Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Re: Grammar Q: From: louise . r . stevanovic
RE: Grammar Q: From: McLauchlan, Kevin
Re: Grammar Q: From: J Wermont
RE: Grammar Q: From: McLauchlan, Kevin
RE: Grammar Q: From: Fred Ridder

Previous by Author: RE: employment law, overtime
Next by Author: RE: Drawing tool
Previous by Thread: RE: Grammar Q
Next by Thread: Re: Grammar Q

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads