TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Developing training materials From:"Dana Worley" <dana -at- campbellsci -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Tue, 13 May 2008 09:45:09 -0600
On Monday, May 12, 2008, Gregory P Sweet wrote:
> Sorry this next bit needs to be shouted: POWERPOINT DOES NOT EQUAL
> While it is a very useful, powerful, and fun tool, just because you call a
> slide show "training" does not mean that you are creating a learning
> experience. Likewise training is not standing in front of a room and
At least monthly (lately it's been more like twice or thrice monthly) we teach a training class in
our facility for our customers. We've done this for years. The training consists of two
instructors who stand in front of the room talking <gasp!>, PowerPoint slides <gasp again! :)
>, and hands-on exercises with our equipment & software. A training manual includes the
slides and other background information. The curriculum is well thought out and has been
refined over the years, yet no one involved in the development of the material has a degree in
education or instructional technology.
We hand out an evaluation form at the end of the class that includes a rating section for
competence of the instructors, course material, presentation, relevance, etc. and an open
comment section. Perhaps we "had no business" developing that training on our own, but the
students always provide glowing reviews in the open comment section stating that the course
material was great, the instructors exceptional, and they would definitely recommend the
course to their co-workers (this is a paid-for course, BTW, plus students must pay for their
I would argue that a competent, organized writer who knows the product well can be just as
successful as someone who has earned an advanced degree (and much more successful
than someone who has the piece of paper but little or no knowledge of the product). One of
the requirements of a technical writer is to present information in a way that others can
understand it and learn from it. I don't see this as deviating too far off the path of training
Software Product Manager/Manager, Software Support Group
Campbell Scientific, Inc.
Microsoft MVP, Windows Help
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-