RE: Alternative to floppy

Subject: RE: Alternative to floppy
From: "Dan Goldstein" <DGoldstein -at- riverainmedical -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:13:02 -0400

Yes, exactly, although there are some user actions that you just can't
force (ex: some devices require archiving at the user's initiative). In
those cases, all you can do is make sure that the instructions are clear
and accessible, and that their importance is understood.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gene Kim-Eng
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 3:50 PM
> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: Re: Alternative to floppy
>
> It sounds to me as if there should be greater emphasis placed
> on "system requirements," both in documents and design, to
> ensure that the system being used has the necessary
> peripherals and that they are used as required.
>
> The last time I worked on FDA-regulated instruments, part of
> the IQ/OQ/PQ included verifying that the necessary hardware
> to save and archive data in the manner required by the
> CFR.was installed and working, and the system was designed to
> not allow the user to start a session if any of the required
> hardware was absent or close down a session without archiving
> data as mandated. In this environment, you don't just tell
> people how to do what they're supposed to do, you make it
> impossible for them to use the product without doing what
> they're supposed to do the way they're supposed to do it.
>

This message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing, copying, electronic storing or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us, by replying to the sender, and delete the original message immediately thereafter. Thank you.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals.
http://www.doctohelp.com

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


References:
RE: Alternative to floppy: From: Dan Goldstein
Re: Alternative to floppy: From: John Posada
RE: Alternative to floppy: From: Dan Goldstein
Re: Alternative to floppy: From: John Posada
RE: Alternative to floppy: From: Dan Goldstein
Re: Alternative to floppy: From: Geoff Lane
RE: Alternative to floppy: From: McLauchlan, Kevin
Re: Alternative to floppy: From: John Posada
RE: Alternative to floppy: From: Dan Goldstein
Re: Alternative to floppy: From: Gene Kim-Eng

Previous by Author: RE: Alternative to floppy
Next by Author: RE: Alternative to floppy
Previous by Thread: Re: Alternative to floppy
Next by Thread: Re: Alternative to floppy


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads