TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> Any good docs manager should be able recognize the work of a good
> technical writer even when the quality of the samples has been
> compromised by real-world constraints such as a lack of time or money
> for copy-editing and proofreading, bad corporate style guides, and so
> on. What professional hasn't struggled to produce good work under such
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Michael
West<WestM -at- ap -dot- aurecongroup -dot- com>
> > Instead of scratching one's head, one might consider whether
> > in grammar, syntax, focus and clarity might (just possibly) exist in
> > writing samples one supplies to prospective employers.
So, you're arguing that Michael is wrong, and that deficiencies in
grammar, syntax, focus, and clarity shouldn't affect the hiring
manager's assessment of an applicant? Really?
What do you suggest the hiring manager use to recognize a good technical
writer -- Vulcan mind-meld? Certification? Oops, sorry. Forget I said
Richard G. Combs
Senior Technical Writer
richardDOTcombs AT polycomDOTcom
rgcombs AT gmailDOTcom
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-