RE: Appropriate -- so inappropriate!

Subject: RE: Appropriate -- so inappropriate!
From: "Combs, Richard" <richard -dot- combs -at- Polycom -dot- com>
To: "Kathleen MacDowell" <kathleen -at- writefortheuser -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:59:48 -0600

Kathleen MacDowell wrote:

> Perhaps you could clarify the sentence beginning, "aggressively non-
> technical ..."?
>
> In my experience, vagueness is more likely to originate with engineers or
> software developers who are busy doing their primary job, which is not
> typically writing instructions or user assistance.
>
> As a non-technical technical writer who does an excellent job documenting
> software and hardware, I also take exception to the whole tenor of your
> comment. A so-called technical writer who would insert an ambiguous phrase
> is simply not in tune with the requirements of the job. It doesn't matter
> if they're "technical" or "non-technical".

I suspect that we mean different things by the term "non-technical." If you don't insert such ambiguous phrases, then you're not the kind of non-technical tech writer I was thinking of. :-)

I've seen plenty of documentation like the procedure I described, and I've met (and occasionally worked with) the authors of such documentation. They typically don't care to understand the products and technology they're documenting, preferring to simply edit and make "look pretty" the information they get from SMEs and other sources. And they often defend their ignorance by saying it makes them more in tune with novice users.

Maybe I shouldn't say "non-technical," which suggests anyone who can't program, hasn't mastered a body of technical knowledge, etc., but I'm not sure what a better term would be. I said _aggressively_ non-technical to suggest someone who not only doesn't know the technology but is opposed to learning about it. Would anti-technical be better?

Richard


Richard G. Combs
Senior Technical Writer
Polycom, Inc.
richardDOTcombs AT polycomDOTcom
303-223-5111
------
rgcombs AT gmailDOTcom
303-777-0436
------






^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
2009 tips, tricks, and best practices.
http://www.doctohelp.com/SuperPages/Webcasts/

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: Appropriate -- so inappropriate!: From: Combs, Richard
Re: Appropriate -- so inappropriate!: From: Kathleen MacDowell

Previous by Author: RE: Aging out was RE: job-hunt weirdness
Next by Author: RE: Appropriate -- so inappropriate!
Previous by Thread: RE: Appropriate -- so inappropriate!
Next by Thread: Re: Appropriate -- so inappropriate!


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads