RE: job-hunt weirdness

Subject: RE: job-hunt weirdness
From: Kat Kuvinka <katkuvinka -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:42:11 -0400

I have to say this because I have seen it over and over and I am still baffled.

I am working now at a start-up with incredibly bright people. We are still hiring developer-types and have very high standards...over 500 people have been screened and rejected. However, I do have the opportunity to interview candidates, and some of their resumes are HORRIBLE! But it doesn't seem to matter here! We get 8-page resumes which are ugly as heck and full of irrelevant fluff. I wouldn't even let it get by if I was in HR.

To be clear, these 500+ candidates, their resumes passed screening and they were rejected during in-person interviews. I have seen this at other places I have worked. My PhD boss at one job had mispellings, personal pronouns, mixed tenses and you name it on his resume.

Are the standards lower the higher your pay, experience, and education level? My company is small, but we are funded by one of the largest companies in the world (wish I was kidding).

What gives?

konfused kat

Windows Live™ Hotmail®: Celebrate the moment with your favorite sports pics. Check it out.

Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
2009 tips, tricks, and best practices.

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


Re: job-hunt weirdness: From: Keith Hood
Re: job-hunt weirdness: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: job-hunt weirdness: From: Robert Lauriston

Previous by Author: RE: IBM Style Guide, 2009 edition
Next by Author: RE: Job openings slim
Previous by Thread: Re: job-hunt weirdness
Next by Thread: Two questions

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads