Re: Review process for online help

Subject: Re: Review process for online help
From: Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:58:16 -0400

Brian Gilbert wrote:

> SME ... didn't I already see this content

Yes, you did. Twice. First time, if you recall, you missed a crucial
error, where I'd left out a parameter to one of the options. The second
time you caught that error, as well as where I'd written flies instead
of files, but I'm sure there's still something else wrong in there. Our
hit rate is still too high. Please read it again, again.

Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
2009 tips, tricks, and best practices.

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


Review process for online help: From: Donna Marino
RE: Review process for online help: From: Gilbert, Brian

Previous by Author: Re: Taking a slightly different tone
Next by Author: Re: A little respect for "unvalidated"
Previous by Thread: RE: Review process for online help
Next by Thread: Re: Review process for online help

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads