Communicator (was Re: Twitter)

Subject: Communicator (was Re: Twitter)
From: Mike Starr <mike -at- writestarr -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:47:44 -0600

I self-identify as a tech writer but as far as I can tell, I'm not anywhere close to dated. I believe I could hold my own in a "throwdown" (thanks, Bobby Flay) with most of my colleagues.

<Digression> Maybe what we need to get some publicity for our profession is an "Iron Writer" or "Throwdown" challenge program.</Digression>

I've not drunk the "communicator" Kool-aid yet because I'm inclined to believe that in the long run what clients and hiring managers want is *writing*... they don't think of it in terms of "communication" even though we may incorporate far more than just writing into our work.

In addition, it just sounds pretentious to me... somewhat akin to "sanitation engineer" for "garbage collector" or "entrenching tool" for "shovel" or "utilize" instead of "use".

I opposed STC's effort to replace "technical writer" with "technical communicator" in the U.S. Department of Labor Dictionary of Occupational Titles for that reason and also because their proposed definition did not at all mention either "writer" or "writing".

Mike Starr WriteStarr Information Services
Technical Writer - Online Help Developer - Technical Illustrator
Graphic Designer - Desktop Publisher - MS Office Expert
(262) 694-1028 - mike -at- writestarr -dot- com -

Collin Turner wrote:
> I am often amazed at how "stuck in our ways" the Tech Writing community
> seems to be. It may be why so many find themselves unemployed and have
> difficulty getting back into the job-stream -- I know, that sounds harsh,
> but it's a fact. Our filed is evolving faster now than at any point in its
> history. To say we're "Tech Writers" is to admit we're dated. We're
> "Communicators". We document in many varied formats. If it's a message of
> 140 characters or a manual of 330 pages, what does it matter so long as the
> meaning is conveyed -- that is what lies at the core of our job, isn't it?
> I use 4 Twitter accounts for multiple purposes. Each of them lives in a
> different ecosystem and each is extremely valuable. Two serve to bring me
> eyes and ears, readers and listeners. As of now I have two podcasts that
> reach over 20,000 listeners per month in more Countries than I can track!
> This has happened in less than 8 months and I would not have that level of
> success without tools like Twitter.
> Do not dismiss it.
> -Collin

Are you looking for one documentation tool that does it all? Author,
build, test, and publish your Help files with just one easy-to-use tool.
Try the latest Doc-To-Help 2009 v3 risk-free for 30-days at:

Help & Manual 5: The all-in-one help authoring tool. Easy to use
but still has all the power you need. Get results fast in an intuitive
authoring environment that works like a familiar word processor.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


Re: Twitter: From: David Neeley
Re: Twitter: From: Dossy Shiobara
Re: Twitter: From: Char James-Tanny
Re: Twitter: From: Collin Turner

Previous by Author: Re: Editable List of Filenames from Windows?
Next by Author: Re: Communicator (was Re: Twitter)
Previous by Thread: RE: Twitter
Next by Thread: Re: Communicator (was Re: Twitter)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads