Subject:Re: Semantic(s) From:jennysubs -at- mac -dot- com To:techwr-l List <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:19:06 -0700
I got "for all intents and purposes" and "coming down the pike".
I had to look up champing at the bit, but it's been used as chomping so long that chomping seems correct.
On Mar 17, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Ken Poshedly wrote:
> The nonexistent "irregardless" jumped right out at me, as did "tow the line" ----> ""toe the line".
>
> -- Kenpo in Atlanta
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Bill Swallow <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>
> To: Janet Swisher <jmswisher -at- gmail -dot- com>
> Cc: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Sent: Wed, March 17, 2010 2:04:47 PM
> Subject: Re: Semantic(s)
>
> Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, it's a moot point. These
> mistakes will always be coming down the pipe and will keep us chomping
> at the bit to tow the line. ;-)
>
> (Go ahead, count 'em!)
>
> Yes, improper use drives me nutty. Not that I'm not there already.
>
Use Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word, or HTML and
produce desktop, Web, or print deliverables. Just write (or import)
and Doc-To-Help does the rest. Free trial: http://www.doctohelp.com
Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at: http://www.ModernAnalyst.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-