RE: Semantic(s)

Subject: RE: Semantic(s)
From: "Boudreaux, Madelyn (GE Healthcare, consultant)" <MadelynBoudreaux -at- ge -dot- com>
To: "techwr-l List" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:23:08 -0400

Bill Swallow gave us enough rope to hang ourselves with:
> Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, it's a moot point. These
> mistakes will always be coming down the pipe and will keep us chomping

> at the bit to tow the line. ;-)

Are you suggesting "moot point" is incorrect?

You lie like a rug!

"will always be coming" is enough to make me cringe.

Madelyn, and it's still not Friday

Use Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word, or HTML and
produce desktop, Web, or print deliverables. Just write (or import)
and Doc-To-Help does the rest. Free trial:

Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


Semantic(s): From: Janet Swisher
Re: Semantic(s): From: Bill Swallow
Re: Semantic(s): From: Ken Poshedly
Re: Semantic(s): From: jennysubs

Previous by Author: RE: Starting over: was re:How do hiring companies view TW resumes?
Next by Author: RE: Semantic(s)
Previous by Thread: Re: Semantic(s)
Next by Thread: Acronym Question

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads