Re: WRONG!..... -ish?

Subject: Re: WRONG!..... -ish?
From: kcbillb2 <kcbillb2 -at- kc -dot- rr -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:34:39 -0600

To all:

I've had enough of "Robert Lauriston" and his pedantic opinions. It's taken me a couple of years to come to this point, but enough is enough.

Anyone who wants to know my private reply to him, just email me. Taking this off-list for the usual reasons.

Bill Buckheit (subscriber since '97)...:)


On 2/3/2012 2:01 PM, Robert Lauriston wrote:

The question was about grammar. Presumably the next sentence explains
the recommendation.

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Cardimon, Craig<ccardimon -at- m-s-g -dot- com> wrote:
Agreed.

It is easy enough to say "It is best to use IE because..." or "We recommend using IE because..."

Throw in some explanation to help quench any curiosity. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as kcbillb2 -at- kc -dot- rr -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
WRONG!..... -ish?: From: McLauchlan, Kevin
Re: WRONG!..... -ish?: From: kcbillb2
RE: WRONG!..... -ish?: From: Dan Goldstein
RE: WRONG!..... -ish?: From: Porrello, Leonard
RE: WRONG!..... -ish?: From: Cardimon, Craig
Re: WRONG!..... -ish?: From: Gene Kim-Eng
RE: WRONG!..... -ish?: From: Cardimon, Craig

Previous by Author: Re: WRONG!..... -ish?
Next by Author: Re: naming doc addendums ?
Previous by Thread: RE: WRONG!..... -ish?
Next by Thread: Re: WRONG!..... -ish?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads