RE: Trends in Tech Comm

Subject: RE: Trends in Tech Comm
From: "Cardimon, Craig" <ccardimon -at- M-S-G -dot- com>
To: "'Steve Janoff (non-Celgene)'" <sjanoff -at- celgene -dot- com>, "'techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com'" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>, 'John Allred' <jack -at- allrednet -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 14:29:53 +0000

Here are my thoughts on this. Feel free to contradict.

The early 1900s were perhaps a more gracious, ordered, and leisurely era. One had time to devote to prose. One didn't dash off a quick email at a traffic light. One sat down, deliberately, with pen and inkwell and notepaper, and carefully created a LETTER. A letter was the primary means of communication. Telephones were quite expensive.

Two world wars, along with several smaller wars, one Great Depression, and innumerable recessions had the effect of wringing most of the elaborate beauty out of writing. One was too busy trying to land a job, feed their families, or simply trying to survive being shot at, to worry much about the beauty of their prose.

And, who has the time to read prose, let alone elegant prose, now? Life keeps speeding up.

My two cents.

-- Craig

-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+ccardimon=m-s-g -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+ccardimon=m-s-g -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of Steve Janoff (non-Celgene)
Sent: vendredi 3 février 2012 21:51
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com; John Allred
Subject: RE: Trends in Tech Comm

Nicely said, John. Thanks so much.

Not to belabor the point, but years ago I fell in love with old writing books from the mid to late 1800s through the early 1900s, and I was always baffled about why we abandoned the old style of writing, which is beautifully elaborate, in favor of a more clipped, just-the-facts style. In those days, every high school child (but only the privileged got to high school) learned how to describe in the written word the world around them, the world of Nature. If you look at those old books, many of which are brilliant, 400 to 600-page tomes containing exquisite instruction, you unwaveringly see massive sections on Figures of Speech, Description (up to 100 pages out of a 600-page book), and Narration (similar length or longer). Look in any contemporary writing book for high school or college students and you'll see maybe one paragraph, if that, on each of Description and Narration.

I always felt that somebody could write a Master's thesis on why prose style (in general, not technical prose) transitioned from the old Romantic style (?) of the Victorian and Edwardian eras (I was not an English major, so forgive any errors here), to the urban, horn-honking style of prose of the middle twentieth century. The only thing I could come up with at the time as a possible reason was the Industrial Revolution, along with urbanization and the needs of modern business to "get to the point." Hence you have Gunning's "Fog Index" of the 1950s, if I remember that right.

I wouldn't want to go back to Olde English but late 1800s / early 1900s has just the right flicker, before that flame went out completely. I guess we'll have to go back and read the books of the past to get that high. The books of the present don't really do it for me.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: On Behalf Of John Allred
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 7:00 AM
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: Trends in Tech Comm

Steve,

I agree with your gist. My thought has always been that the style of writing documentation, as we think of it today, came about during our period of rapid industrialization and borrowed initially from both the scholarly, pedantic style of academia and the very formalized style of business writing of those times. It was either scientific in tone and voice, or an affected business style. I doubt there was any concept of "end user" like we have today.

While an educated or technical audience might prefer a highly precise, technical, and dry, style of writing, your typical end user, I think it's fair to say, prefers a somewhat more casual style that implies the writer has a personality and is more "like" the reader. Isn't that sort of the essence of Apple? The "for the rest of us" attitude?

John Allred

On 2/2/2012 9:42 PM, Steve Janoff (non-Celgene) wrote:
> Let me restate and say that I feel what's being drained out of documentation is the art and craft of writing, and part of that is style (not necessarily a writer's personality but a compelling "voice"). This doesn't have to do with the reduction of words but is more a product of standardization (mechanization, automation).

*********************************************************
THIS ELECTRONIC MAIL MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENT IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MAY CONTAIN LEGALLY PRIVILEGED INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR INDIVIDUALS NAMED ABOVE.
If the reader is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender to notify us of the error and delete the original message. Thank You.
*********************************************************

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as ccardimon -at- m-s-g -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
Information contained in this e-mail transmission is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, do not read, distribute or reproduce this transmission (including any attachments). If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone or email reply.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
Trends in Tech Comm: From: Steve Janoff (non-Celgene)
RE: Trends in Tech Comm: From: Steve Janoff (non-Celgene)
Re: Trends in Tech Comm: From: Tony Chung
RE: Trends in Tech Comm: From: Steve Janoff (non-Celgene)
Re: Trends in Tech Comm: From: John Allred
RE: Trends in Tech Comm: From: Steve Janoff (non-Celgene)

Previous by Author: RoboHelp 9 vs. Flare 7
Next by Author: RE: Is there a term for this?
Previous by Thread: RE: Trends in Tech Comm
Next by Thread: RE: Trends in Tech Comm


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads