Re: spam and who you formerly were

Subject: Re: spam and who you formerly were
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 12:41:42 -0800

Unsubscribe links from reputable companies (the ones you actually
subscribed to) work most of the time. For the rest, most mail readers now
have spam buttons that automatically move messages to trash or a spam
folder and simultaneously report the sender's address to databases so
future mail from the same address will automatically be deleted and
re-reported.

Gene Kim-Eng


On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:56 AM, McLauchlan, Kevin <
Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com> wrote:

> If you have any experience with the internet at all, you NEVER click a
> link in mail that you regard as spam.
>
> That’s like waving a big flag “I’m a real live sucker, please turn on the
> spam-hose full-blast!”
>
> It pretty much guarantees an exponential increase in spam to any address
> that confirms there’s a warm body at the end of it.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

http://bit.ly/doc-to-help

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
spam and who you formerly were: From: McLauchlan, Kevin
RE: spam and who you formerly were: From: Margaret Cekis
Re: spam and who you formerly were: From: Steve Schwarzman
RE: spam and who you formerly were: From: McLauchlan, Kevin

Previous by Author: Re: spam and who you formerly were
Next by Author: Re: spam and who you formerly were
Previous by Thread: RE: spam and who you formerly were
Next by Thread: RE: spam and who you formerly were


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads